Purpose: Focusing on Italian public higher education institutions (HEIs), this study examines whether an increase in remarks in unqualified audit reports increases the likelihood that a female auditor has chaired the audit team issuing such reports.
Design/methodology/approach: To answer its research question, the paper regresses the gender of the audit team chair with, among other factors, the number of remarks in the unqualified audit reports that are assumed to be a measure of audit quality.
Findings: The results show that in Italian public HEIs, it is more probable that audit reports characterised by high audit quality (i.e., those with more remarks) are issued by audit teams chaired by female auditors.
Originality/value: These findings contribute to existing knowledge and have implications for practice. They might be explained by the innate qualities of women as well as by environmental factors such as limited litigation risk characterising both the country and the sector investigated. So, they do not contradict either the Institutional Logic perspective or the Ethics of Care Theory, according to which the environment and the aptitude to manage conflict differ between men and women.
Keywords: audit reports, auditor gender, audit quality
Mechelli A., Sforza V., Cimini R. (2024). Does audit quality affect the probability that a female auditor has chaired the audit team? Empirical evidence from Italian public HEIs, Financial Reporting, 1, 57-82. Doi: 10.3280/FR2024-001004
